Saint Louis Billikens vs Missouri Tigers, College Basketball Picks

Fri, Nov 6 · 7:00 PM ET · Enterprise Center
‹›
Tools
Loading tools…
Model Projection
These numbers come from a power-rating model built on the method Billy Walters lays out in his book Gambler, seeded from ESPN's own real college basketball power index.
Projected Spread
MIZ -1
No real live market line available yet.
Projected Total
156
No real live market line available yet.
Projected Moneyline
MIZ -110
No real live market line available yet.
This projection and current market action are supplementary and do not influence the final qualitative pick and analysis of today's game.
Season stats ordered from most to least relevant. Longer bar, stronger league standing.
SLUMIZ
87.2 (10th)
Points
(95th) 79.2
How many points does the team score per game?
(League Avg: 75.7 Pts/Game)
50.9% (7th)
Field Goal %
(22nd) 49.0%
How often does the offense make a shot from the field?
(League Avg: 45.1%)
40.1% (2nd)
3-Point %
(118th) 35.0%
How often does the offense make a three point shot?
(League Avg: 33.9%)
74.4% (103rd)
Free Throw %
(307th) 68.6%
How often does the offense make a free throw?
(League Avg: 72.3%)
18.3 (T10th)
Assists
(158th) 14.1
How many assists does the offense record per game?
(League Avg: 14.0 Ast/Game)
12.5 (T273rd)
Turnovers
(268th) 12.4
How many turnovers does the offense give away per game?
(League Avg: 11.6 TO/Game)
70.5 (80th)
Points Allowed
(227th) 75.5
How many points does the defense allow per game?
(League Avg: 74.0 Pts/Game)
29.7 (3rd)
Defensive Rebounds
(215th) 24.0
How many defensive rebounds does the team grab per game?
(League Avg: 24.5 Reb/Game)
7.2 (128th)
Steals
(T176th) 6.7
How many steals does the defense record per game?
(League Avg: 6.7 Stl/Game)
3.5 (T151st)
Blocks
(154th) 3.5
How many shots does the defense block per game?
(League Avg: 3.4 Blk/Game)
Matchup Breakdown
Saint Louis's offense: One of the most potent offensive teams in all of Division I in the 2025-26 season, Saint Louis scores in bunches and connects on threes at a rate only one other program in the country has matched. Their ball movement is exceptional, though they give the ball away more than you'd like from a team of their caliber.
Missouri's offense: A solid but unremarkable offensive unit in the 2025-26 season, Missouri scores at a mid-tier Division I rate and shoots reasonably well from the field, but their three-point shooting and free throw shooting both fall well short of the national average, and their ball movement is just average.
Saint Louis's defense: Saint Louis is the stronger defensive team by a clear margin, holding opponents to well below what most Division I programs allow and crashing the defensive glass at a rate that ranks among the very best in the country.
Missouri's defense: Missouri's defense is noticeably below average across the board in the 2025-26 season, allowing more points than most Division I programs and failing to secure defensive rebounds at an acceptable rate.
Overall: Saint Louis brings a far more complete game into this matchup, with an offense that ranks among the nation's best and a defense that is genuinely stingy, while Missouri struggles on both ends by comparison. The most telling collision is Saint Louis's exceptional three-point shooting running into a Missouri defense that already has trouble limiting opposing offenses. Missouri would need a significant performance above their season norms to keep pace in the 2025-26 season.
Scorer Matchup
Each team's real detected leading scorer, and how he has actually played.
Trey Green
Trey Green
G · SLU
Tier
Role Player
Points/Game
11.1
Rebounds/Game
2.8
Assists/Game
1.7
Field Goal %
47.2%
3-Point %
45.7%
Free Throw %
86.1%
2025-26 season numbers
Jordan Crawford
Jordan Crawford
G · MIZ
Tier
Reliable Scorer
Points/Game
14.4
Rebounds/Game
2.9
Assists/Game
1.4
Field Goal %
41.4%
3-Point %
36.8%
Free Throw %
74.5%
2025-26 season numbers
The Read
Saint Louis's leading scorer: Trey Green has functioned as a role player rather than a primary option in the 2025-26 season, contributing modest scoring alongside light rebounding and playmaking. He is a supplementary piece, not a player teams need to build a defensive scheme around.
Missouri's leading scorer: Jordan Crawford has operated as a reliable scoring option in the 2025-26 season, carrying a heavier offensive load and serving as a genuine first option for Missouri's attack. He does enough across the board to demand defensive attention on every possession.
The efficiency: Green has been the sharper shooter of the two, converting at a high rate from the field and from deep while getting to the line and finishing there cleanly. Crawford has leaned more on volume than efficiency, posting a notably lower field goal percentage and a middling three-point rate, which tempers the value of his scoring edge.
Overall: Crawford holds the clear scoring advantage as a true lead option against a role player, but Green's efficiency gap is real and cannot be ignored. Missouri's top scorer generates more points but does so less cleanly, while Saint Louis's scorer does less but wastes little. The edge belongs to Crawford in raw impact, though the efficiency disparity keeps this from being a commanding individual advantage.
Team Conditions
Schedule rest, recent form, and the current injury report.
SLUMIZ
Rest
4 days since the last game, real extra rest.
Standard preparation, 3 days rest.
Form
2025-26 record 29-6 (home 19-0, road 7-3)
2025-26 record 20-13 (home 15-3, road 5-6)
InjuryKey Players
None reported
None reported
The Read
Saint Louis's availability: The injury report is quiet, with no meaningful absences flagged heading into this matchup.
Missouri's availability: Missouri is also fully intact on paper, with no significant injuries to account for.
Rest and form: Saint Louis carries a slight edge in preparation, having had an extra day of recovery compared to Missouri's standard turnaround. The Billikens have been one of the stronger teams in the 2025-26 season overall, though they have stumbled in stretches of late. Missouri has been struggling for consistency, dropping several consecutive games before this point.
Overall: Saint Louis arrives in better shape across the board, with a notably stronger season record and a fresher body heading into the game. Missouri has been leaking losses down the stretch and enters on the wrong side of recent form. The conditions favor Saint Louis, though both rosters are healthy and the gap in preparation is modest rather than decisive.
Side Write-Up
Saint Louis covers here on the strength of a far more complete team profile across every dimension that matters against the spread. Their offense ranks among the nation's best in the 2025-26 season, connecting from three at a rate only one other program in the country has matched, and that firepower is running into a Missouri defense that already struggles to limit opposing offenses under normal circumstances. The defensive side of the ball only reinforces the case, with Saint Louis holding opponents well below the Division I average while crashing the defensive glass at an elite rate, compared to a Missouri unit that allows more points than most programs and fails to secure defensive rebounds at an acceptable rate. Saint Louis also arrives with an extra day of rest and a notably stronger season record, while Missouri has been dropping games consecutively and enters on the wrong side of recent form. The strongest counterargument is that Jordan Crawford gives Missouri a genuine first option capable of demanding defensive attention on every possession, while Trey Green is functioning as a supplementary piece rather than a primary scorer in the 2025-26 season, which creates a meaningful individual imbalance at the top of each offense. That edge belongs to Crawford and is real, but it does not offset the team-level gaps across offense, defense, rebounding, and preparation that all tilt toward Saint Louis, and Crawford's reliance on volume over efficiency tempers how much damage that individual advantage can actually produce. Missouri would need a significant performance above their season norms simply to keep pace, and there is no evidence in the current form or matchup structure to suggest that performance is coming.
Final PickSaint Louis Billikens
Total Write-Up
The Over is supported by a structural mismatch that runs in one clear direction: Saint Louis carries one of the most potent offenses in all of Division I in the 2025-26 season, and Missouri's defense is noticeably below average across the board, allowing more points than most Division I programs and failing to rebound defensively at an acceptable rate. The specific collision that matters most is Saint Louis's exceptional three-point shooting running straight into a Missouri defense that already has trouble limiting opposing offenses, which creates a high-probability path to elevated scoring on that end alone. Missouri's offense will have a harder time generating its share, facing a Saint Louis defense that is genuinely stingy and ranks among the best in the country at denying second-chance opportunities off the defensive glass, but Missouri has a reliable lead scorer in Jordan Crawford who carries a heavier offensive load and demands attention, and their offense is functional enough to contribute to a cumulative score. Saint Louis's ball movement is exceptional and their scoring comes in bunches rather than in isolated moments, which means their good offensive possessions tend to compound rather than stall. The strongest counterargument is that Saint Louis's own defense could so thoroughly suffocate Missouri's offense that it neutralizes the scoring Saint Louis generates on the other end, keeping the total contained even with elite offensive production. That is a reasonable concern given how genuinely strong Saint Louis's defense is, but Missouri's below-average defensive unit is the weaker of the two stoppers in this game, and Saint Louis's offense is rated far higher than Missouri's offense is rated, so the net scoring pressure across both teams still points toward an elevated combined total in the 2025-26 season.
Final PickOver
VIMB
Written by
VIMB
47,000+
Followers Across All Socials
17+
Brand Partners
3+
Years Experience
1,000+
Games Tested
This information is for entertainment purposes only and is not any form of financial or gambling advice. Sports involve high variance therefore always be responsible and manage your risk accordingly.
Tools
Loading tools…
Read next
Free Promos for Your Next Bet!
Current offers for your area. Pick your region and the list updates.
Select Your Location