UL Monroe Warhawks vs Texas A&M Aggies, College Basketball Picks

Mon, Nov 9 · 8:00 PM ET · Reed Arena
‹›
Tools
Loading tools…
Model Projection
These numbers come from a power-rating model built on the method Billy Walters lays out in his book Gambler, seeded from ESPN's own real college basketball power index.
Projected Spread
TA&M -27.5
No real live market line available yet.
Projected Total
160.5
No real live market line available yet.
Projected Moneyline
TA&M -4900
No real live market line available yet.
This projection and current market action are supplementary and do not influence the final qualitative pick and analysis of today's game.
Season stats ordered from most to least relevant. Longer bar, stronger league standing.
ULMTA&M
72.4 (264th)
Points
(13th) 86.1
How many points does the team score per game?
(League Avg: 75.7 Pts/Game)
41.3% (336th)
Field Goal %
(143rd) 45.8%
How often does the offense make a shot from the field?
(League Avg: 45.1%)
31.9% (295th)
3-Point %
(50th) 36.2%
How often does the offense make a three point shot?
(League Avg: 33.9%)
73.1% (161st)
Free Throw %
(136th) 73.7%
How often does the offense make a free throw?
(League Avg: 72.3%)
12.2 (298th)
Assists
(12th) 18.1
How many assists does the offense record per game?
(League Avg: 14.0 Ast/Game)
12.1 (T247th)
Turnovers
(119th) 10.8
How many turnovers does the offense give away per game?
(League Avg: 11.6 TO/Game)
83.9 (355th)
Points Allowed
(312th) 78.9
How many points does the defense allow per game?
(League Avg: 74.0 Pts/Game)
23.1 (293rd)
Defensive Rebounds
(T100th) 25.5
How many defensive rebounds does the team grab per game?
(League Avg: 24.5 Reb/Game)
6.1 (T232nd)
Steals
(42nd) 8.1
How many steals does the defense record per game?
(League Avg: 6.7 Stl/Game)
3.4 (T165th)
Blocks
(T188th) 3.2
How many shots does the defense block per game?
(League Avg: 3.4 Blk/Game)
Matchup Breakdown
UL Monroe's offense: Among the least productive offenses in Division I in the 2025-26 season, struggling to shoot the ball at an acceptable rate from anywhere on the floor and generating very few assists relative to the field.
Texas A&M's offense: One of the highest-scoring and best-connected offenses in the country in the 2025-26 season, moving the ball fluently, converting at a solid rate from beyond the arc, and taking care of possessions better than most teams in Division I.
Texas A&M's defense: Middling overall but with a genuine standout quality: an ability to force turnovers at a rate that ranks among the better teams in Division I, paired with solid work on the defensive glass.
UL Monroe's defense: Among the most porous in the country in the 2025-26 season, giving up points at a rate that places them near the very bottom of Division I and offering little resistance on the boards or in the passing lanes.
Overall: Texas A&M holds a clear advantage at every level of the matchup. Their offense, which thrives on ball movement and efficient shot creation, runs directly into a UL Monroe defense that has struggled to slow anyone down all season. Add a defense that actively creates turnovers, and A&M has real ways to compound UL Monroe's offensive inefficiency into a lopsided possession battle.
Scorer Matchup
Each team's real detected leading scorer, and how he has actually played.
Dayjaun Anderson
Dayjaun Anderson
G · ULM
Tier
Bench Piece
Points/Game
5.4
Rebounds/Game
1.7
Assists/Game
0.7
Field Goal %
33.9%
3-Point %
24.1%
Free Throw %
52.9%
2025-26 season numbers
PJ Haggerty
PJ Haggerty
G · TA&M
Tier
Elite Scorer
Points/Game
23.4
Rebounds/Game
5.3
Assists/Game
3.8
Field Goal %
48.9%
3-Point %
35.1%
Free Throw %
70.1%
2025-26 season numbers
The Read
UL Monroe's leading scorer: Dayjaun Anderson has functioned as a bench contributor in the 2025-26 season, offering modest scoring and limited playmaking off the pine. His role reflects depth rather than featured offensive responsibility.
Texas A&M's leading scorer: PJ Haggerty has been a genuine offensive engine for the Aggies in the 2025-26 season, capable of creating his own shot, contributing on the glass, and distributing at a level unusual for a primary scorer. He carries the load across multiple dimensions of the game.
The efficiency: Anderson has shot poorly from the field and from three, and has struggled to convert at the free throw line, making him a low-efficiency option even in a limited role. Haggerty has shot at a strong clip from the field and from distance while converting free throws at a reliable rate, meaning his volume production comes with real efficiency behind it.
Overall: The gap between these two players is among the widest you will see in a scorer matchup panel. UL Monroe's top detected scorer is a fringe rotation piece, which signals either a thin offensive roster or a situation where the team's real contributors have not yet posted enough games to register clearly. Haggerty meanwhile represents a legitimate offensive anchor, and that imbalance in individual scoring firepower tilts the offensive ceiling heavily toward Texas A&M.
Team Conditions
Schedule rest, recent form, and the current injury report.
ULMTA&M
Rest
5 days since the last game, real extra rest.
Standard preparation, 3 days rest.
Form
2025-26 record 4-28 (home 3-10, road 1-15)
2025-26 record 22-12 (home 14-4, road 6-5)
InjuryKey Players
None reported
None reported
The Read
UL Monroe's availability: No significant injuries are reported for UL Monroe heading into this game, so the roster appears to be at full strength.
Texas A&M's availability: Texas A&M also enters with a clean injury report, meaning neither side carries a meaningful personnel disadvantage.
Rest and form: UL Monroe comes in with extra rest after a longer gap between games, while Texas A&M arrives on a more standard turnaround. The form picture is starkly different though: UL Monroe has been struggling badly through the 2025-26 season, losing their most recent games in a row, while Texas A&M has played into the postseason and shown the ability to beat quality competition late in the year.
Overall: Texas A&M is clearly in the stronger position here, backed by a winning record in the 2025-26 season, recent postseason experience, and a dominant home record. UL Monroe's extra rest is a minor edge on paper, but it does little to offset the wide gap in form and competitive level between these two programs heading into a home game for the Aggies.
Side Write-Up
Texas A&M covers at home against UL Monroe based on a matchup that favors the Aggies at every level of the game. Their offense in the 2025-26 season ranked among the best in Division I for ball movement, shot creation, and possession efficiency, and it runs directly into a UL Monroe defense that has been one of the most porous units in the country all year. PJ Haggerty gives Texas A&M a genuine offensive anchor who creates his own shot, rebounds, and distributes at a level that UL Monroe's rotation simply has no answer for, while Dayjaun Anderson as UL Monroe's top detected scorer signals a thin offensive roster with no real counterweight. Texas A&M's defense adds another layer by generating turnovers at a rate that ranks among the better units in Division I, which compounds UL Monroe's already-limited ability to run an efficient half-court offense. The Aggies enter with a winning record in the 2025-26 season, recent postseason experience, and a dominant home record at Reed Arena, while UL Monroe carries a losing streak and a form line that points in the wrong direction. The one genuine counterargument is that UL Monroe arrives with extra rest after a longer gap between games, which can occasionally tighten outcomes at the margins. That edge dissolves against the weight of the competitive gap here, where a program coming off postseason play and boasting a superior roster from top to bottom is a substantial favorite to win and cover in a true home game.
Final PickTexas A&M Aggies
Total Write-Up
The Over is the play in a game where one team's offense has the tools to generate a high-scoring output and the other team's defense offers almost no resistance. Texas A&M's offense in the 2025-26 season moved the ball fluently, converted from beyond the arc at a solid rate, and protected possessions better than most teams in Division I, meaning they arrive with the infrastructure to score efficiently and in volume. UL Monroe's defense placed near the very bottom of Division I in points allowed during the 2025-26 season, surrendering points at a rate that suggests almost any functional offense will find consistent success against them. On the other side of the ledger, UL Monroe's offense has been among the least productive in Division I, struggling to shoot from anywhere on the floor, but Texas A&M's defense is middling overall and its strongest trait is forcing turnovers rather than holding down scoring, which still leaves points on the board. Haggerty's efficiency across field goal attempts, threes, and free throws means Texas A&M's primary scorer is built to keep the scoreboard moving, and the absence of injuries on either side confirms both rosters are operating at full capacity. The main counterargument is that UL Monroe's offensive struggles could suppress their contribution to the total, keeping the combined score lower than the over needs. Texas A&M's ability to exploit UL Monroe's defensive breakdowns at will, combined with a home environment and a clear talent edge, points to an Aggies scoring output large enough on its own to carry the total over even if UL Monroe contributes modestly on their end.
Final PickOver
VIMB
Written by
VIMB
47,000+
Followers Across All Socials
17+
Brand Partners
3+
Years Experience
1,000+
Games Tested
This information is for entertainment purposes only and is not any form of financial or gambling advice. Sports involve high variance therefore always be responsible and manage your risk accordingly.
Tools
Loading tools…
Read next
Other Games Today
Free Promos for Your Next Bet!
Current offers for your area. Pick your region and the list updates.
Select Your Location