Sacramento State Hornets vs Central Michigan Chippewas, NCAAF Picks

Wed, Nov 11 · 7:30 PM ET · Kelly/Shorts Stadium
›
Tools
Loading tools…
Model Projection
These numbers come from a power-rating model built on the method Billy Walters lays out in his book Gambler.
Projected Spread
CMU -19.5
Projected Total
45.5
Projected Moneyline
CMU -690
This projection and current market action are supplementary and do not influence the final qualitative pick and analysis of today's game.
Season stats ordered from most to least relevant. Longer bar, stronger national standing.
SACCMU
17.0 (133rd)
Points
(131st) 17.9
How many points does the team score per game?
(League Avg: 28.5 Pts/Game)
295.9 (132nd)
Total Yards
(133rd) 291.5
How many yards does the offense gain per game?
(League Avg: 389.2 Yds/Game)
188.3 (111th)
Pass Yards
(134th) 122.2
How many passing yards does the offense gain per game?
(League Avg: 227.3 Pass Yds/G)
107.6 (127th)
Rush Yards
(49th) 169.3
How many rushing yards does the offense gain per game?
(League Avg: 161.9 Rush Yds/G)
32.5% (123rd)
3rd Down
(T103rd) 35.5%
How often does the offense convert on third down?
(League Avg: 40.4%)
4.45 (136th)
Yards/Play
(128th) 4.69
How many yards does the offense average per play?
(League Avg: 5.68 Yds/Play)
15 (T130th)
Giveaways
(T72nd) 11
How many turnovers has the offense given away?
(League Avg: 10 Giveaways)
30.3 (114th)
Points Allowed
(T85th) 25.9
How many points does the defense allow per game?
(League Avg: 24.4 Pts/Game)
363.8 (73rd)
Yards Allowed
(68th) 358.8
How many yards does the defense allow per game?
(League Avg: 357.5 Yds/Game)
196.1 (41st)
Pass Yds Allowed
(25th) 180.1
How many passing yards does the defense allow per game?
(League Avg: 213.2 Pass Yds/G)
167.7 (104th)
Rush Yds Allowed
(113th) 178.6
How many rushing yards does the defense allow per game?
(League Avg: 144.3 Rush Yds/G)
11 (T112th)
Sacks
(T83rd) 15
How many times has the defense sacked the quarterback?
(League Avg: 17 Sacks)
20 (T130th)
Tackles For Loss
(T123rd) 23
How many run or pass plays has the defense stopped behind the line?
(League Avg: 35 TFL)
5 (T79th)
Interceptions
(T22nd) 8
How many passes has the defense intercepted?
(League Avg: 6 INT)
14 (T21st)
Takeaways
(T80th) 10
How many turnovers has the defense forced?
(League Avg: 11 Takeaways)
Matchup Breakdown
Sacramento State's offense: Among the least productive offenses in the country in the 2026 season, Sacramento State struggles to generate yards per play at a rate near the bottom of all FBS programs. Their tendency to give the ball away compounds an already limited attack considerably.
Central Michigan's offense: Central Michigan scores nearly as infrequently as Sacramento State in the 2026 season, and their passing game ranks among the worst nationally. The run game offers a relative edge, sitting above average across the country, though third-down conversion remains a persistent weakness.
Central Michigan's defense: Central Michigan's pass coverage ranks among the better units nationally in the 2026 season, and their ability to create interceptions sits near the top of all FBS programs. They surrender ground yardage more readily, but the strength in coverage shapes this matchup significantly.
Sacramento State's defense: Sacramento State limits opposing passing games at a solid rate, but gives up points at a concerning clip and generates almost no pressure behind the line of scrimmage, ranking among the worst nationally in tackles for loss. Their takeaway rate is a genuine bright spot, sitting among the better units in the country.
Overall: Central Michigan holds the more complete matchup profile here, with pass coverage among the better units nationally aimed directly at an offense that struggles to throw the ball efficiently. Their above-average ground game also faces a Sacramento State front that has had difficulty stopping the run throughout the 2026 season, giving Central Michigan a second reliable path to moving the chains. Sacramento State's solid pass defense does work against a Central Michigan passing game that ranks among the worst nationally, but Sacramento State's own habit of surrendering the ball cancels out much of what their defense creates.
Quarterback Matchup
The two starters, and how each has actually played.
Jackson Sharman
Jackson Sharman
QB #8 · SAC
Tier
Struggling
Passer Rating
109.1
Completion
56.2%
Yards/Game
170.4
TD / INT
8 / 6
Yards/Attempt
5.6
Sacks Taken
14
2026 season numbers
Angel Flores
Angel Flores
QB #7 · CMU
Tier
Struggling
Passer Rating
105.2
Completion
58.7%
Yards/Game
67.9
TD / INT
2 / 2
Yards/Attempt
5.2
Sacks Taken
11
2026 season numbers
The Read
Sacramento State's quarterback: Jackson Sharman has been an active passer in the 2026 season, putting up genuine aerial production but carrying real turnover risk in the process. He has the upside to make plays downfield, but his interception tendencies signal a quarterback who forces throws when the pocket breaks down.
Central Michigan's quarterback: Angel Flores has been used sparingly as a passer in the 2026 season, with CMU's offense running primarily through its ground game. His ball security in limited opportunities has been clean, but the thin sample leaves genuine uncertainty about how he holds up when asked to win a game through the air.
The protection: Sharman has absorbed more hits behind his line in the 2026 season than Flores has behind his, suggesting Sacramento State's offensive front has been the leakier of the two. Flores has been brought down at a meaningful rate as well, so neither starter is operating behind particularly sturdy protection.
Overall: Sharman holds the real edge under center on the basis of passing production and touchdown volume, but his turnover tendencies mean that advantage comes with a meaningful caveat. Flores is the cleaner ball handler, yet CMU's reluctance to lean on him in the 2026 season leaves his ceiling in a pass-dependent game genuinely uncertain. The gap between these two starters is narrower than raw production implies, with Sharman carrying more upside and more risk in equal measure.
Team Conditions
Schedule rest, recent form, and the current injury report.
SACCMU
Rest
Standard week of preparation, 7 days rest.
Standard week of preparation, 7 days rest.
Form
2026 record 2-7 (home 2-3, road 0-4)
2026 record 3-5 (home 3-2, road 0-3)
InjuryKey Players
K. Peevy (WR) · Out - Undisclosed
C. Borders (RB) · Out - Undisclosed
A. Bryant (WR) · Out - Undisclosed
E. Huddle (TE) · Out - Undisclosed
B. Collins (RB) · Out - Undisclosed
J. Williams (TE) · Questionable - Undisclosed
A. Flores (QB) · Questionable - Concussion
S. Foster II (WR) · Questionable - Undisclosed
J. Clerveaux (RB) · Questionable - Undisclosed
J. Allen (TE) · Out - Undisclosed
The Read
Sacramento State's availability: Sacramento State is missing multiple skill position contributors across receiver, running back, and tight end, with a second tight end also uncertain. The volume of absences thins their offensive depth considerably, though no single name stands out as a star-level loss.
Central Michigan's availability: The more pointed concern is at quarterback, where A. Flores is listed as questionable following a concussion, leaving Central Michigan's offensive command genuinely in question. Beyond that, a receiver, a running back, and a tight end are also uncertain or unavailable, adding further noise to an already unsettled skill group.
Rest and form: Both teams arrive on equal preparation time, so neither holds an edge there. Sacramento State comes in as the road team with a winless away record in the 2026 season, while Central Michigan has been more competitive at home but enters in the middle of a multi-game losing skid.
Overall: Central Michigan's home setting provides a structural advantage over a Sacramento State side that has not won on the road at all in the 2026 season. The uncertainty around A. Flores at quarterback is a genuine variable that clouds Central Michigan's picture, but Sacramento State carries their own depth losses across multiple offensive positions and no road form to draw on. Central Michigan's home record reflects a more stable floor despite their recent string of losses.
Weather & Stadium
Game-time conditions and whether they actually matter here.
39°F
Kelly/Shorts Stadium
Open Air
Roof: Open air, conditions are in play
Temperature: 39°F, cold enough to affect grip on deep throws and the kicking game
Wind: 5mph, light enough to leave the passing and kicking game alone
Precipitation: 4% chance, rain looks unlikely in the latest forecast
N5 mph
The Read
The stadium: Kelly/Shorts Stadium is an open air venue, so ambient conditions are fully in play for this game. There is no dome or roof to neutralize what the forecast brings.
The conditions: The air is cold enough to affect grip on deep throws and to introduce some unreliability into the kicking game, though the wind is light enough to leave ball flight mostly undisturbed. Rain looks unlikely based on the latest forecast, so precipitation is essentially a non-factor.
Overall: Cold air is the one genuine factor here, carrying enough bite to tighten things at the margins of the passing and kicking game without overwhelming either team's approach. Wind and precipitation add nothing to the equation. The net effect is a mild lean toward the under relative to a neutral-weather baseline, though nothing in the forecast rises to the level of a defining weather story for Sacramento State or Central Michigan.
Side Write-Up
Sacramento State's case for winning outright runs directly through Central Michigan's offensive uncertainty. The concussion question mark on Angel Flores is not a minor footnote, it is the central fact that reshapes what Central Michigan can actually do offensively. CMU was already running almost nothing through Flores in the 2026 season, so if his availability is compromised, the passing game that already ranked among the worst nationally becomes even harder to trust. Sacramento State brings genuine defensive assets into this spot, with a solid pass defense and a takeaway rate sitting among the better units in the country, which pairs directly against a CMU offense that cannot afford to give the ball away. CMU is also in the middle of a multi-game losing skid with additional skill group injuries at receiver, running back, and tight end, meaning the depth behind Flores is thin no matter how the quarterback situation resolves. The strongest counterargument is Sacramento State's winless away record in the 2026 season, which is a real pattern and not noise. But Central Michigan's home edge is blunted substantially by a losing streak, a decimated skill group, and a starting quarterback whose ability to play is genuinely in doubt, and Sacramento State's defense is built to exploit exactly the kind of limited passing attack CMU runs.
Final PickSacramento State
Total Write-Up
Both offenses in this game rank among the least productive in FBS during the 2026 season, and nothing in the conditions or injury reports suggests either side is positioned to outperform that baseline. Central Michigan's passing game is among the worst nationally, and with Flores listed as questionable following a concussion, the ceiling on their aerial attack is even more compressed than usual. Sacramento State arrives missing multiple skill position contributors at receiver, running back, and tight end, which further limits an offense that was already near the bottom of all FBS programs in yards per play. The cold air at Kelly/Shorts Stadium introduces grip issues on deep throws and some unreliability in the kicking game, adding a genuine lean toward the under at the margins of the passing and kicking game. Neither quarterback is operating behind particularly sturdy protection, which shortens drives and raises the floor for empty possessions. The genuine counterargument to the under is CMU's above-average ground game, which could sustain drives and push the total higher if it consistently finds room against Sacramento State's front. But Sacramento State's ability to create turnovers and their solid pass defense limits Central Michigan's most dangerous path to points, and without a reliable passing game to keep defenses honest, the run game alone rarely generates enough scoring to threaten an over in a game where both offenses are this compromised.
Final PickUnder
VIMB
Written by
VIMB
47,000+
Followers Across All Socials
17+
Brand Partners
3+
Years Experience
1,000+
Games Tested
This information is for entertainment purposes only and is not any form of financial or gambling advice. Sports involve high variance therefore always be responsible and manage your risk accordingly.
Tools
Loading tools…
Read next
Other games this week
Free Promos for Your Next Bet!
Current offers for your area. Pick your region and the list updates.
Select Your Location